Company Rankings

In Fall 2011, two groups released studies assessing transparency and accountability in political spending of S&P100 companies.  The rankings of these two studies are provided below as a resource for understanding the political spending policies and practices at some of the country's largest companies.  Companies which received a score of 80 or higher (out of 100) in both indexes have been highlighted in green to note their "top-tier" ranking; companies which received a score of 20 or below (out of 100) in both indexes have been highlighted in red to note their "bottom-tier" ranking. CPA released an updated ranking in Fall of 2012.

> Click here for profiles of the 20 Least Transparent Companies 

(report released March 2012)

 rolling_in_dough_but_silent_in_spending.png

The first of these indexes, the Baruch Index of Corporate Political Disclosure (“Baruch Index”) measures a company's willingness to disclose and be transparent about its corporate political activity, with regard to: (1) Ease with which someone can find the relevant materials on the corporate website; (2) What policies, procedures, and corporate governance structures are in place and disclosed; and (3) What the corporation says about who and what it gives to, and how those donations are made. Companies received scores from 0-100, within the following categories: Transparent/Top Tier (above 80); Strong (61–80); Moderate (41–60); Weak: (21–40); and Opaque/Lowest Tier (0–20).  For more information on the Baruch Index, visit http://www.baruch.cuny.edu/baruchindex/.

The second of these indexes, the CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability (“CPA-Zicklin Index”) depicts (1) The ways that companies engage in, manage and oversee political spending, or refrain from it; (2) The specific spending restrictions that many companies have adopted; and (3) The policies and practices that leave room for the greatest improvement.  Companies received scores from 0-100 based on an analysis of 29 indicators to gauge disclosure, policies, compliance, and oversight.  For more information on the CPA-Zicklin Index, visit http://www.politicalaccountability.net/index.php?ht=d/sp/i/5848/pid/5848

 

 

Do you like this page?

Showing 10 reactions


Andrew Slater commented 2011-12-08 10:18:21 -0500 · Flag
Companies are neither moral nor immoral. They just do what serves their shareholders. Nondisclosure often serves their shareholders and the law seems to recognize the wisdom of it.
@sunmooncrab tweeted link to this page. 2011-12-07 23:19:53 -0500
sunmooncrab commented 2011-12-07 23:15:03 -0500 · Flag
Thank You SOOO Much for these works. I’ve been looking for something like this for a little wile now. I haven’t read threw anything yet. I just saw u on de Tv. One thing, if I could suggest. Well I love the simplisity so far. Perfect. But maybe throw a little more Sy Fy on to ur web joint. Nothing to crazy. But theirs gonna be alot of people thats gonna make this one of their main pages to visit. I sware to UU. Either way I’m so glad I found yall. We gots to get em Right. Keep up da EXcELENT WORK. And God Bless.
Steven Williams commented 2011-12-07 18:58:02 -0500 · Flag
WOW,Thanks to this list I will be calling Allstate tomorrow and cancelling my six accounts also my Lowe’s account.
Andrew Slater commented 2011-12-07 17:25:18 -0500 · Flag
I dislike the assumption underlying this site: That Americans are inherently stupid and need to be protected from the speech of big companies because they will react like zombies.
@sh4nnoncrawford tweeted link to this page. 2011-12-07 16:58:34 -0500
Company Rankings http://t.co/5G1BLmSc
@sandray411 tweeted link to this page. 2011-12-07 16:52:09 -0500
Company Rankings http://t.co/hbtV9AT4
@Dgordonscott tweeted link to this page. 2011-12-07 16:43:09 -0500
Company Rankings http://t.co/3PvJ1Im1
@piratessa tweeted link to this page. 2011-12-07 16:42:22 -0500
Corporate Political Contribution Transparency Company Rankings http://t.co/LZmUSvXk
@lcousinaw tweeted link to this page. 2011-12-07 16:35:07 -0500